READ ALL ABOUT IT

Header

Illinois

In a recent COBRA case, an Illinois employer went above and beyond to mend its ways. It did not matter. The court imposed a penalty anyway.

The case of Fama v. Design Assistance Corporation is an instructive lesson for all who are involved with COBRA administration. Mistakes are easy to make but often are hard to forgive. The employer strayed from the COBRA path in at least three ways:

1) Notice failure. When the employee allegedly abandoned her job, the employer failed to send a COBRA election notice. The election notice was sent about 11 months after the qualifying event.

2) Incorrect reason for failing to offer COBRA. When the ex-employee's attorney pointed out the notice failure, the employer's initial response was that she was terminated for cause. Wrong answer. The only permissible excuse in this case would have been gross misconduct, and job abandonment does not qualify.

3) Taking on the DOL. The employer initially ruled that her COBRA coverage was not eligible for the ARRA subsidy, even though the employer initiated the termination. The DOL intervened, and the ARRA subsidy was applied.

Eventually, the employer reinstated coverage retroactively at no cost to the former employee. This step was more than COBRA requires. The district court concluded that the employer did not act in bad faith or with malicious intent. However, it awarded a $10 daily penalty for the notice failure, leaving open the possibility of awarding attorney's fees and court costs. (It could have been worse: The maximum daily penalty is $110). Of course, the employer has already had to spend some 18 months defending a case that could have easily been avoided.